Optimizing Kazakhstan’s water budget through subsurface floodwater recharge

Authors

  • D.K. Sadanova Kazakh-British Technical University, Kazakhstan
  • R.Sh. Amanzholova Kazakh-British Technical University, Kazakhstan
  • I.K. Rakhmetov Institute of Hydrogeology and Geoecology named after U.M. Akhmedsafin, Kazakhstan
  • Issa Rakhmetov Institute of Hydrogeology and Geoecology named after U.M. Akhmedsafin
  • J. Sagin Kazakh-British Technical University, Kazakhstan
  • Zh.A. Onglassynov Institute of Hydrogeology and Geoecology named after U.M. Akhmedsafin, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51301/ejsu.2025.i5.04

Keywords:

Managed Aquifer Recharge, economic efficiency, water supply, climate change, water resources, sustainable develop-ment

Abstract

The study is dedicated to analyzing the economic efficiency of Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) systems as a method of sustainable water supply under the conditions of climate change and water resource scarcity. The work explores the fundamental principles of MAR, its advantages in reducing water supply costs, minimizing water losses, improving resilience to extreme climatic conditions, and maintaining ecosystem balances. Special attention is given to the economic and social benefits that the use of MAR can provide to agriculture and local communities. The research methodology includes an analysis of existing practices, economic modeling, and an assessment of the impact of implementing MAR technologies at the regional level. The results demonstrate that MAR is an effective and economically advantageous strategy for water supply, promoting sustainable use of water resources and improving quality of life. The scientific novelty lies in justifying the economic feasibility of applying MAR systems in the context of climate change, while the practical significance of the study lies in the potential to implement the findings into real-world water resource management practices.

 

References

Wu, Y. & Shen, Y. (2021). Simulation of climate change impacts on groundwater recharge in an arid region using SWAT and MODFLOW. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 66(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1852247

Sallwey, P., Schröder, L. & McDonald, C. (2024). Assess-ment of managed aquifer recharge in semi-arid regions under climate change using integrated modeling. Hydrogeology Journal, 32(3), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-024-02456-w

Makyzhanova, D., Yessekin, B., Tulegenova, G. & Issanova, G. (2023). Assessment of water management challenges in arid Central Asia: A case study of Kazakhstan. Water, 15(5), 874. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050874

Schleiss, A.J., De Cesare, G. & Hermann, F. (2016). Hydro-power production and sediment management. Hydraulic En-gineering and Sustainable Infrastructure, CRC Press

Zhao, Q., Wang, W., Wang, D. & Chen, X. (2019). Urban stormwater management based on sponge city construction: A case study of Changzhou, China. Water, 11(4), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040767

Akhmetshin, E.M., & Kovalenko, K.E. (2019). Innovation in environmental management in Kazakhstan: Barriers and op-portunities. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 659-671. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(47)

Zare, F. & Kalantari, Z. (2018). Flood resilience in urban areas: A review of the role of green infrastructure. Sustaina-bility, 10(11), 3913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113913

Sallwey, J., Thompson, J. & McVicar, T. (2019). Hydrogeo-logical performance and sustainability of MAR systems: Long-term evaluation from Australia. Water, 11(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010098

Dillon, P., Pavelic, P., Page, D., Beringen, H. & Ward, J. (2019). Managed aquifer recharge in Australia: History, cur-rent status and future prospects. Water, 11(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010046

Adar, E.M., Nativ, R. & Mandel, A.D. (2012). Wastewater reuse and aquifer recharge: Economic, regulatory and envi-ronmental perspectives from Israel. Environmental Earth Sciences, 65, 1845-1855

Sprenger, C., Hartog, N. & Stuijfzand, P.J. (2017). Economic and environmental assessment of MAR systems in Spain. Hydrogeology Journal, 25(5), 1389-1402

California Department of Water Resources (2018). Flood-MAR: Using flood water for managed aquifer recharge to support sustainable water resources. Sacramento, CA

Reznik, D., Baudoin, M.A. & Perez-Blanco, C.D. (2022). The role of institutions in groundwater recharge: A case study from California. Water Resources Research, 58(5), e2021WR030356. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031261

Ross, A. (2022). Economic performance of MAR systems: A global review of costs and benefits. Journal of Hydrology, (610), 127915

Halytsia, O., Jakubowski, M. & Kowalski, A. (2022). Eco-nomic viability and community perception of aquifer re-charge in rural Poland. Water Resources Management, (36), 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03303-0

Kazhydromet. (2020). Annual Hydrological Report of Ka-zakhstan: Chilik River Basin. Almaty

Institute of Geography and Water Security. (2018). Geo-graphical Atlas of Kazakhstan: Water Resources and Use. Almaty

Zhumabayev, B. & Duysembayev, R. (2017). Hydrological regime and water use in the Chilik Valley. Journal of Central Asian Water Studies, 9(2), 24-31

WWF Central Asia (2021). Water quality monitoring report for Balkhash-Alakol Basin. Bishkek

FAO AQUASTAT. (2023). Kazakhstan – Irrigation and Water Management Country Profile. Rome: FAO

Martynenko, A.V. (2015). Agricultural development and water use in the Shelek Valley: Trends and perspectives. Agrarian Science of Kazakhstan, (3), 42-48

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Sadanova, D. ., Amanzholova, R. ., Rakhmetov, I. ., Rakhmetov, I., Sagin, J. ., & Onglassynov, Z. . (2025). Optimizing Kazakhstan’s water budget through subsurface floodwater recharge. Engineering Journal of Satbayev University, 147(5), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.51301/ejsu.2025.i5.04